RTL functional verification
UVM and SystemVerilog testbenches, block-to-top, across control, DSP and multi-clock domains.
UVM / SystemVerilogMulti-clockBlock → top
Weeks
To coverage-closing capacity — not three months of hand-holding.
Home / Capabilities / Verification & Validation
Verification, where
schedules are won.
Design verification, validation against requirements, RTL block-level functional verification, regression and coverage closure — run by engineers fluent in your flow, who stay long enough to know it.
In short
Design verification and validation run by engineers fluent in your flow: RTL block-level functional verification, regression and coverage closure, and mixed-signal validation.
- RTL block-level functional verification
- Regression and coverage closure
- Mixed-signal and SoC validation
- Requirements-based validation in your toolchain
7.0%
Voluntary attrition. The continuity augmentation never gave you.
Named
Real engineer profiles within days — no CV-padding, no bait-and-switch.
Independent
Verification kept structurally separate from the design team.
Why verification, specifically
Verification is where silicon schedules go to die.
Every schedule discussion lands here, and a respin traced to a verification escape is a career event. So the bar is competence in the first meeting — not a sales engineer’s reassurance.
01
Fluent in your flow
CMRT-style security testing, QEMU/FPGA automation, RTL across clock domains, post-layout mixed-signal — the same class of work, spoken in the same dialect.
02
Named engineers, real history
You talk to the actual engineers, not a sales engineer — with relevant profiles named within days.
03
Continuity that holds
The engineers who learn your testbench are the ones who keep closing coverage on it.
What it covers
Four disciplines under one capability.
Each is a discipline the verification lead searches for by name — and can start as a single specialist seat or a full squad.
Coverage & regression closure
Coverage planning, regression stability and sign-off-quality closure against plan.
Coverage closureRegressionSign-off
Mixed-signal & post-layout
Analog verification for high-speed SerDes and mixed-signal post-layout simulation.
SerDesPost-layout simMixed-signal
Modelling & DFT
MATLAB and C++ algorithm validation, floating/fixed-point modelling, synthesis, timing and DFT.
MATLAB / C++Fixed/float modellingSynthesis · timing · DFT
Who this is for
The verification lead who gates on competence.
Verification managers and DV leads at IP and silicon companies, running coverage closure and testbench architecture with two requisitions open longer than anyone admits — and burned before by augmentation engineers who needed three months of hand-holding and left after nine.
We evaluate the way they do: people, not logos — CVs, a technical conversation with the actual engineers, and evidence of the same class of work.
IP & silicon companiesASIC / mixed-signalUVM · formal · mixed-signalNamed profiles in days
A WORKED EXAMPLE
Coverage sign-off · reviewed
Coverage sign-off · reviewed
| Engagement | SerDes analog verify |
| Domains | control · DSP · multi-clock |
| Coverage | closed to plan |
| Start-readiness | Days |
Illustrative of a specialist seat that grew into a verification squad. Figures shown as illustration, source status stated.
How you engage this capability
Start small, or start as a squad.
| Route in | When it fits | Commercial position |
|---|---|---|
| Specialist engineer | One departed senior DV, or a block beyond the team’s bandwidth. | Flexible · capacity-led |
| Spanish Team | You want the strongest quality reference and European delivery. | Saving vs. consultancy |
| Hybrid Team | You need more DV capacity for the same budget. | ≈ 25% illustrative |
Savings are illustrative, drawn from live engagement economics — never contractual commitments. See team economics →
FAQ
Common questions
What verification work do you cover?
RTL block-level functional verification, regression, coverage closure and mixed-signal validation, plus requirements-based validation.
Do your engineers work in our verification flow and tools?
Yes — squads are matched to be fluent in your methodology and toolchain rather than imposing their own.
Is verification kept independent from design?
Yes — verification is structurally separate from the team whose work it checks, which is the point of outsourcing it.
How fast can you scale a verification team?
Capacity typically arrives in weeks; start with one engineer and grow to an embedded squad as the backlog demands.
Where are the engineers based and in what time zone?
Spain-led, with same-time-zone hubs across Egypt, Morocco and Tunisia for full working-day overlap.
Verification that closes coverage