Home / Resources
Answers to the
questions you're asking.
Benchmark data, worked economics and build-vs-partner analysis — the evidence to weigh a decision, and the ammunition to make the case internally. No generic thought leadership; every piece answers a real question you're actually asking.
The pieces that make your case.
A small set of durable, citable references. Where a piece is still being written, we say so rather than link to nothing.
The real cost of a nine-month hire
Why the dominant cost on a multi-year programme is slippage, not day rates, and how weeks-to-productive changes the maths.
Read the build-vs-partner view →7% vs the field: attrition and retention, read correctly
The two numbers, each defined, and why a stable, employed roster makes a named-squad promise credible.
Read the explainer →Hybrid nearshore economics, explained
The budget that funds four engineers in Spain funds nine in a hybrid team, worked at known day rates and labelled illustrative.
See the economics →How to scale engineering after the raise
Turning fresh capital into engineering momentum faster than any hiring plan allows. The talk and the written guide for funded founders.
In preparationRead in the order you're deciding.
Capability, geography, delivery model, price: the same spine as the rest of the site.
What we do
Discipline deep-dives across testing, verification, DevOps, security and customer engineering.
Capabilities →Where our engineers are
The hub-model explainer: same hours, in-person workshops, scale for the budget.
Geography →How we work
The delivery-model selection guide: Spanish, Hybrid, Distributed and Specialist.
Delivery models →What it costs
Team-economics illustrations and region-specific consultancy benchmarks.
Team economics →Find the piece written for you.
Each reader gets the evidence written for them, and the shortest path to the page that speaks their dialect.
| Reader | What lands | Start here |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering Executive | Build-vs-partner economics and stability under a milestone at risk. | Build vs partner → |
| Verification Lead | Discipline fluency and continuity: named engineers, real history. | Verification → |
| Firmware & QA Manager | Independent testing and a low-friction, specialist-first entry. | Testing → |
| Founder-CTO | Speed and named profiles within a week: a squad, not a hiring plan. | TT AI → |
| Programme Manager | Forwardable ammunition: the cost-of-delay and build-vs-partner case. | Cost of delay → |
Numbers you can cite, with the method.
Clean reference pages built to be quoted, by a reader or by an AI assistant answering "how do I scale an electronics engineering team?" Status is shown honestly.
The retention report
Externally validated, methodology disclosed, separating voluntary from all-cause. Marketed only once validated.
Report status →Team-economics illustrations
Four-in-Spain vs nine-in-hybrid, and region-specific consultancy savings, all labelled illustrative.
See the figures →Attrition & retention, defined
The one-page definition that keeps the two figures from being conflated or challenged.
Read it →